Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California granted Intervenor Plaintiff Templeton Marsh, Ltd.’s unopposed motion to compel discovery from Defendants in a breach-of-contract action. The court ordered Defendants to provide complete responses and documents, execute verifications, and pay $1,681.50 in attorney’s fees and costs under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37.
Holdings
- The requested documents and information were relevant to the claims and defenses, were not shown to be privileged, and were proportional to the needs of the case.
- Defendants waived any objections to the discovery requests by failing to serve responses or objections within the time required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
- The court granted the motion to compel and ordered Defendants to serve complete responses and produce all requested documents, including a signed verification under penalty of perjury that the responses were complete.
- Because the motion to compel was granted and Defendants failed to establish an exception, the court awarded Templeton Marsh $1,681.50 in reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred in preparing the motion.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court should compel Defendants to respond to Templeton Marsh’s document requests when Defendants served no responses or objections.
- Whether the requested discovery was relevant, nonprivileged, and proportional to the needs of the case.
- Whether Templeton Marsh was entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5)(A).
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (7)
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders, 437 U.S. 340, 351 (1978)(followed)
- Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 501 (1947)(followed)
- Nugget Hydroelectric, L.P. v. Pac. Gas & Elec. Co., 981 F.2d 429, 438-39 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
- Blankenship v. Hearst Corp., 519 F.2d 418, 429 (9th Cir. 1975)(followed)
- Superior Commc’ns v. Earhugger, Inc., 257 F.R.D. 215, 217 (C.D. Cal. 2009)(followed)
- Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 54 (9th Cir. 1995)(followed)
- Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling Consultants, 959 F.2d 1468, 1473 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…