Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California partially grants and partially denies Plaintiff G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC’s motion for summary judgment on damages. The court awards $5,000 in statutory damages under 47 U.S.C. § 605 and $2,860 in compensatory damages for conversion, while declining to award enhanced statutory damages because willfulness for commercial advantage or private financial gain was not established. The total damages award is $7,860.
Holdings
- Plaintiff was entitled to $5,000 in statutory damages for Defendant's violation of 47 U.S.C. § 605.
- Plaintiff was not entitled to enhanced statutory damages because it did not establish that Defendant willfully committed the violation for commercial advantage or private financial gain.
- Plaintiff was entitled to $2,860 in compensatory damages for conversion.
- Summary judgment was appropriate in part because Defendant failed to identify a genuine dispute of material fact concerning the damages issues, but it was denied as to enhanced statutory damages because Plaintiff failed to establish willfulness for commercial advantage or private financial gain.
Questions Presented
- What amount of statutory damages should be awarded for Defendant's violation of 47 U.S.C. § 605?
- Whether Plaintiff was entitled to enhanced statutory damages under 47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(3)(C)(ii) based on a willful violation for commercial advantage or private financial gain.
- Whether Plaintiff was entitled to $2,860 in conversion damages based on the value of the unlawfully broadcast program.
- Whether summary judgment was appropriate on the damages issues.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (12)
- Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157 (1970)(followed)
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323-24 (1986)(followed)
- Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 585-87 (1986)(followed)
- First Nat’l Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Serv. Co., 391 U.S. 253, 288-89 (1968)(followed)
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248, 251-52, 255 (1986)(followed)
- SEC v. Seaboard Corp., 677 F.2d 1301, 1305-06 (9th Cir. 1982)(followed)
- Richards v. Nielsen Freight Lines, 602 F. Supp. 1224, 1244-45 (E.D. Cal. 1985), aff’d, 810 F.2d 898 (9th Cir. 1987)(followed)
- J & J Sports Prods., Inc. v. Marcaida, No. 10-5125 SC, 2011 WL 2149923, at *3 (N.D. Cal. May 31, 2011)(followed)
- J & J Sports Prods., Inc. v. Ferreyra, No. CIVS08128LKKKJM, 2008 WL 4104315, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 28, 2008)(followed)
- Cablevision Sys. New York City Corp. v. Faschitti, No. 94 Civ. 6830(DC), 1996 WL 48689, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 7, 1996)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 12.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…