Giovanni McDowell v. Steve Smith, et al.

McDowell v. Smith · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · October 15, 2025 · No. 1:24-cv-00500-SAB (PC)

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California denied Giovanni McDowell’s motion for issuance of a subpoena duces tecum because he had not first sought the documents from Defendants through discovery or moved to compel production. The court directed the Clerk of Court to send Plaintiff a one-time courtesy copy of specified exhibits attached to his original complaint.

Holdings

  1. A pro se prisoner seeking a subpoena for documents from a nonparty must first establish that the documents are not equally available to him and cannot be obtained from Defendants through a request for production; if Defendants object, the required next step is a motion to compel. Because Plaintiff had not shown that he followed those steps, the motion for issuance of a subpoena was denied.
  2. Although the subpoena motion was denied, the court directed the Clerk to send Plaintiff a one-time courtesy copy of the specified exhibits attached to his complaint.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Plaintiff was entitled to issuance of a subpoena duces tecum for grievances attached to his original complaint without first seeking the documents from Defendants through ordinary discovery procedures.
  2. Whether the court should provide Plaintiff a courtesy copy of the grievance exhibits attached to his complaint.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (5)

  • Sands v. Lewis, 886 F.2d 1166, 1169 (9th Cir. 1989)(followed)
  • Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 351 (1996)(noted)
  • Jones v. Franzen, 697 F.2d 801, 803 (7th Cir. 1983)(persuasive)
  • Wanninger v. Davenport, 697 F.2d 992, 994 (11th Cir. 1983)(persuasive)
  • Reynolds v. Wagner, 128 F.3d 166, 183 (3d Cir. 1997)(persuasive)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…