Summary
The document is an order and findings and recommendations in a wage-and-hour and Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act action in the Eastern District of California. The court discharges the order to show cause as to defaulted defendants but recommends granting T&C Vineyards’ motion to dismiss and dismissing T&C with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders.
Holdings
- The five Rule 41(b) factors weighed in favor of dismissal because Plaintiffs failed to advance the action against T&C, failed to comply with status-report and scheduling-order requirements, prejudiced T&C through prolonged unexplained delay, and had already received warnings and lesser measures.
- The bankruptcy proceeding involving defaulted defendant Ricardo Trevino Jr. did not excuse Plaintiffs' failure to prosecute the action against T&C Vineyards or their failure to comply with the Court's reporting and class-certification requirements.
- The show-cause order was discharged only as to defaulted defendants R T Farm Labor, Inc., Ricardo Trevino Jr., Ricardo Gomez Trevino, and Harold Chuhlantseff, subject to Plaintiffs filing a detailed status report concerning Ricardo Trevino Jr.'s bankruptcy and related adversary proceeding.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Court should impose dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) based on Plaintiffs' failure to comply with court orders and failure to prosecute their claims against T&C Vineyards.
- Whether Plaintiffs' pursuit of a related bankruptcy proceeding involving a defaulted defendant excused their failure to prosecute the action against T&C Vineyards.
- Whether less drastic alternatives to dismissal were available.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (9)
- Yourish v. California Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642-43 (9th Cir. 2002)(followed)
- Ter-Galstanyan v. County of Kern, No. 1:22-cv-00645-JLT-CDB, 2024 WL 2747628, at *2 (E.D. Cal. May 29, 2024)(followed)
- Thompson v. Housing Authority, 782 F.2d 829, 831 (9th Cir. 1986)(followed)
- Anderson v. Air West, 542 F.2d 522, 524 (9th Cir. 1976)(followed)
- In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Products Liability Litigation, 460 F.3d 1217, 1228 (9th Cir. 2006)(followed)
- King v. Kansas City Southern Industries, Inc., 519 F.2d 20, 25 (7th Cir. 1975)(distinguished)
- Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014)(followed)
- Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…