Summary
The document contains Findings and Recommendations from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California following screening of Jovan R. Guillory’s second amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The magistrate judge recommends allowing an Eighth Amendment excessive-force claim to proceed against Correctional Officer Alcantar, dismissing the remaining claims, and dismissing defendants Christian Pfeiffer, E. Stark, and N. Montanez. The recommendations were issued with a 14-day objection deadline.
Holdings
- Liberally construed and accepting its factual allegations as true, the second amended complaint stated a cognizable Eighth Amendment excessive-force claim against Alcantar because it alleged that Alcantar orchestrated the altercation and used force maliciously, unnecessarily, and without a good-faith effort to maintain security.
- The complaint failed to state claims against Montanez, Stark, or Pfeiffer because it did not adequately allege their personal participation, a causal connection, an unconstitutional policy or custom, or facts supporting a failure-to-train claim.
- The complaint failed to state a deliberate-indifference claim against any defendant.
- The complaint failed to state a due-process claim because it did not allege that any of the minimum procedural protections required in a prison disciplinary proceeding were denied, and the record contained some evidence supporting the disciplinary decision.
Questions Presented
- Whether the second amended complaint stated a cognizable Eighth Amendment excessive-force claim against Alcantar.
- Whether the complaint stated Eighth Amendment excessive-force or failure-to-train and supervisory-liability claims against Montanez, Stark, or Pfeiffer.
- Whether the complaint stated an Eighth Amendment deliberate-indifference claim concerning medical care after Guillory’s injuries.
- Whether the complaint stated a Fourteenth Amendment procedural-due-process claim based on the prison disciplinary proceeding.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (49)
- Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1990)(followed)
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N.A., 534 U.S. 506, 512-13 (2002)(followed)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 676-78 (2009)(followed)
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555, 570 (2007)(followed)
- Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 342 (9th Cir. 2010)(followed)
- Bruns v. National Credit Union Administration, 122 F.3d 1251, 1257 (9th Cir. 1997)(followed)
- Doe I v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 572 F.3d 677, 681 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 373-75 (1976)(followed)
- Johnson v. Duffy, 588 F.2d 740, 743 (9th Cir. 1978)(followed)
- Simmons v. Navajo County, Arizona, 609 F.3d 1011, 1020-21 (9th Cir. 2010)(limited)
Showing top 10 of 49.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…