Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California orders that counsel be sought for Gurpartap Singh, an immigration detainee proceeding pro se in a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition, if he is financially eligible. The court refers the matter to the Federal Public Defender’s Office and directs that office to report on eligibility within seven days; the Clerk is directed to serve the order and petition on the Federal Defender.
Holdings
- There is no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings.
- The interests of justice would be served by appointment of counsel if Petitioner is financially eligible, given the complexity of the legal issues involved.
Questions Presented
- Whether counsel should be appointed for a financially eligible pro se immigration detainee in a § 2241 habeas proceeding when the interests of justice require it.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir. 1986)(followed)
- Anderson v. Heinze, 258 F.2d 479, 481 (9th Cir. 1958)(followed)
- Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…