Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California grants Defendants’ request to extend the deadline for filing their pretrial statement because Plaintiff had not yet filed his statement. Defendants must file their statement by April 7, 2025, and may amend it after reviewing Plaintiff’s submission.
Holdings
- Good cause existed to modify the scheduling order because Plaintiff had not filed his pretrial statement, so Defendants' request for an extension was granted. Defendants were permitted to file their pretrial statement by April 7, 2025, with leave to amend it after reviewing Plaintiff's submission.
Questions Presented
- Whether Defendants had shown good cause under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(4) to extend the deadline for filing their pretrial statement.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
- Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison Co., 302 F.3d 1080, 1087 (9th Cir. 2002)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…