Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California grants pro se plaintiff Hassaun Haygood’s application to proceed in forma pauperis in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Danny Chavez. The court states that it will screen the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) before issuing summons or requiring the defendant to respond.
Holdings
- Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted because the information provided demonstrates entitlement to proceed without prepayment of fees.
- No summons shall issue and service shall not be undertaken until the court completes its screening of the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).
Questions Presented
- Whether plaintiff demonstrated entitlement to proceed in forma pauperis.
- Whether summons and service should issue before the court completes screening of the in forma pauperis complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (5)
- Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000)(followed)
- Calhoun v. Stahl, 254 F.3d 845 (9th Cir. 2001)(followed)
- Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1106 (9th Cir. 1995)(followed)
- Ross v. Padres LP, No. 17-CV-1676 JLS (JLB), 2018 WL 280026, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2018)(followed)
- Rosiere v. United States, No. 217CV02468APGPAL, 2018 WL 7357399, at *1 (D. Nev. Sept. 10, 2018)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…