Hill v. Payne

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · June 24, 2025 · No. 2:25-cv-0433 DAD CKD P

Summary

The document contains findings and recommendations by a United States magistrate judge in Hill v. Payne. Because the plaintiff did not file an amended complaint by the deadline after dismissal with leave to amend, the court recommends dismissing the action without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Local Rule 110 because plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint after being granted leave to amend.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (1)

  • Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…