Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California grants plaintiff Ivory Lewis Downs, Jr.'s motion for a third thirty-day extension of the discovery deadline. The court extends the discovery and motion-to-compel deadlines, denies plaintiff's request for appointed counsel, and explains that the record does not establish exceptional circumstances under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1).
Holdings
- Good cause supported granting plaintiff's motion for a third thirty-day extension and extending the related discovery and motion-to-compel deadlines.
- The court denied appointment of counsel because plaintiff failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances; difficulty completing discovery and inability to obtain security-restricted documents are circumstances common to prisoners and do not, without more, warrant a request for voluntary assistance of counsel.
Questions Presented
- Whether plaintiff demonstrated good cause for a third thirty-day extension of the deadline to serve discovery requests.
- Whether plaintiff demonstrated exceptional circumstances warranting the court's request for voluntary assistance of counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1).
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (5)
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989)(followed)
- Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)
- Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990)(followed)
- Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…