Ivory Lewis Downs, Jr. v. M. Jiminez, et al.

Downs v. Jiminez · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · December 29, 2025 · No. 2:22-cv-1021 TLN AC P

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California grants plaintiff Ivory Lewis Downs, Jr.'s motion for a third thirty-day extension of the discovery deadline. The court extends the discovery and motion-to-compel deadlines, denies plaintiff's request for appointed counsel, and explains that the record does not establish exceptional circumstances under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1).

Holdings

  1. Good cause supported granting plaintiff's motion for a third thirty-day extension and extending the related discovery and motion-to-compel deadlines.
  2. The court denied appointment of counsel because plaintiff failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances; difficulty completing discovery and inability to obtain security-restricted documents are circumstances common to prisoners and do not, without more, warrant a request for voluntary assistance of counsel.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether plaintiff demonstrated good cause for a third thirty-day extension of the deadline to serve discovery requests.
  2. Whether plaintiff demonstrated exceptional circumstances warranting the court's request for voluntary assistance of counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1).

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (5)

  • Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989)(followed)
  • Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)
  • Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990)(followed)
  • Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)
  • Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…