Summary
The document contains findings and recommendations in a prisoner civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The magistrate judge recommends granting defendants’ motion to dismiss based on alleged material misrepresentations in the plaintiff’s in forma pauperis application and dismissing the action with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(A). The parties were given 21 days to file objections.
Holdings
- Plaintiff submitted a false in forma pauperis application because she failed to disclose funds and assets available to pay the filing fee.
- Plaintiff's material omissions were made in bad faith, not through a mere inaccuracy or inadvertent error.
- Dismissal with prejudice was the appropriate sanction for plaintiff's false and bad-faith in forma pauperis application.
Questions Presented
- Whether plaintiff's in forma pauperis application contained a false allegation of poverty within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(A).
- Whether plaintiff's material omissions were made in bad faith rather than being a mere inaccuracy or oversight.
- Whether dismissal with prejudice was an appropriate sanction for the false and bad-faith in forma pauperis application.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (9)
- Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988)(followed)
- Jefferson v. United States, 277 F.2d 723, 725 (9th Cir. 1960)(followed)
- Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1179-81 (9th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- Harris v. County of Orange, 682 F.3d 1126, 1131-32 (9th Cir. 2012)(followed)
- Kennedy v. Huibregtse, Case No. 13-C-004, 2015 WL 13187300, at *2 (E.D. Wis. Nov. 13, 2015), aff'd, 831 F.3d 441 (7th Cir. 2016)(followed)
- Rivera v. Drake, 767 F.3d 685, 686 (7th Cir. 2014)(followed)
- Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1234 n.8 (9th Cir. 2015)(followed)
- Dawson v. Lennon, 797 F.2d 934, 935-36 (11th Cir. 1986) (per curiam)(followed)
- Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…