Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California dismissed without prejudice Janah Dannell Ortiz’s petition for a writ of mandamus concerning ongoing state criminal proceedings. The court adopted the magistrate judge’s findings in part, declined to interfere under Younger abstention principles, directed the Clerk to provide civil-rights forms, and declined to issue a certificate of appealability.
Holdings
- Mandamus relief was unavailable based on Ortiz's allegations and the relief he sought.
- The court was required to abstain from interfering with Ortiz's ongoing state criminal proceedings.
- The petition had to be dismissed without prejudice rather than with prejudice.
- The court declined to issue a certificate of appealability because Ortiz did not make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
Questions Presented
- Whether the petition for a writ of mandamus stated a basis for mandamus relief.
- Whether the federal court should abstain from interfering with Ortiz's ongoing state criminal proceedings.
- Whether dismissal should be with or without prejudice where the petition potentially implicated civil-rights claims.
- Whether Ortiz was entitled to a certificate of appealability.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (7)
- Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971)(followed)
- Fiorito v. Entzel, 829 Fed. Appx. 192, 193 (9th Cir. 2020)(followed)
- American Trial Lawyers Assoc., New Jersey Branch v. New Jersey Supreme Court, 409 U.S. 467, 469 (1973)(followed)
- Orth v. Johnson, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 4179, at *1 (9th Cir. Feb. 21, 2023)(followed)
- Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 335-336 (2003)(followed)
- Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)(followed)
- Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 893 (1983)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…