Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California transfers Jason Robert Porter's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition to the Central District of California. The court determines that venue is proper in the district of conviction because the petition challenges a criminal judgment from the San Luis Obispo County Superior Court, and notes that it has not ruled on the in forma pauperis request.
Holdings
- A habeas petition challenging a criminal judgment from the San Luis Obispo County Superior Court is properly heard in the federal district encompassing the district of conviction, the Central District of California.
- The action should be transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Eastern District of California was the proper venue for a state habeas petition challenging a criminal judgment from the San Luis Obispo County Superior Court.
- Whether the court should transfer the petition to the Central District of California under 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d) and § 1404(a).
Disposition
remanded
Cases Cited (4)
- Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 442 (2004)(followed)
- Carbo v. United States, 364 U.S. 611, 618, 81 S. Ct. 338, 5 L. Ed. 2d 329 (1961)(followed)
- Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989)(followed)
- Laue v. Nelson, 279 F. Supp. 265, 266 (N.D. Cal. 1968)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…