Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California granted plaintiff’s counsel’s motion for attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) following a remand and favorable award of Social Security benefits. The court awarded $26,000 and ordered counsel to refund plaintiff the $5,900 previously awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
Holdings
- The requested $26,000 attorney fee was reasonable and could be awarded under § 406(b), because it was below the statutory twenty-five-percent ceiling and was supported by the favorable result, counsel's experience, the time spent, the absence of delay or substandard performance, and the risk of loss.
- Upon receiving the § 406(b) award, counsel must refund plaintiff the $5,900 previously awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
Questions Presented
- Whether counsel's requested $26,000 fee under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) was reasonable.
- Whether counsel was required to refund the smaller EAJA award to plaintiff after receiving the § 406(b) fee.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (8)
- Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 798 n.6 (2002)(followed)
- Crawford v. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142, 1147 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc)(followed)
- Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 808-09 (2002)(followed)
- Crawford v. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142, 1151 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc)(followed)
- De Vivo v. Berryhill, 2018 WL 4262007 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 6, 2018)(followed)
- White v. Berryhill, No. cv 04-00331-AS, 2017 WL 11634804, at *3 (C.D. Cal. July 7, 2017)(followed)
- Monica H. v. Comm’r, Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 3:16-cv-2111-JR (D. Or. Jan. 25, 2021)(followed)
- Kelly Kay M. v. O'Malley, No. 22-cv-1969-DDL, 2024 WL 4536462, at *3 (S.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2024)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…