Summary
The United States Magistrate Judge recommends denying Plaintiff Jeff Kile’s motion for class certification in a pro se civil rights action. The recommendation concludes that an incarcerated, non-lawyer proceeding without counsel cannot fairly and adequately represent a class under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a)(4), and also notes that the motion does not provide enough information to assess permissive joinder under Rule 20.
Holdings
- An incarcerated nonlawyer proceeding pro se cannot fairly and adequately protect the interests of a putative class under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a)(4), and therefore cannot serve as the class representative in this action.
- Plaintiff's motion for class certification should be denied because he cannot satisfy Rule 23(a)(4)'s adequacy-of-representation requirement.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff, an incarcerated nonlawyer proceeding pro se, could satisfy Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a)(4)'s requirement that a class representative fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.
- Whether Plaintiff's motion for class certification should be denied.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (8)
- McShane v. United States, 366 F.2d 286 (9th Cir. 1966)(followed)
- Oxendine v. Williams, 509 F.2d 1405, 1407 (4th Cir. 1975)(followed)
- Martin v. Middendorf, 420 F. Supp. 779 (D.D.C. 1976)(followed)
- Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014)(followed)
- Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)
- Visendi v. Bank of America, N.A., 733 F.3d 863, 870 (9th Cir. 2013)(followed)
- Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co., 232 F.3d 1271, 1296 (9th Cir. 2000)(followed)
- Desert Empire Bank v. Ins. Co. of N. Am., 623 F.2d 1371, 1375 (9th Cir. 1980)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…