Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California granted in part an ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order filed by Jenifer Nohelia Hernandez Lopez, who challenged her immigration detention under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court ordered her immediate release on the conditions applicable before her December 8, 2025, detention and prohibited re-detention absent exigent circumstances without notice and a pre-detention hearing before a neutral adjudicator. The court denied without prejudice the request to enjoin removal and waived the bond requirement.
Holdings
- For purposes of the temporary restraining order, petitioner established a likelihood of success on her Fifth Amendment procedural due process claim because she was re-detained after release under § 1226(a) without notice and an opportunity for a pre-detention hearing before a neutral adjudicator.
- The factors of irreparable harm, balance of equities, and public interest favored granting the temporary restraining order.
- Immediate release on the same conditions that governed petitioner’s release before her December 8, 2025 detention was necessary to restore the status quo ante.
Questions Presented
- Whether petitioner demonstrated a likelihood of success on her procedural due process claim arising from re-detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) without notice and a pre-detention hearing before a neutral adjudicator.
- Whether petitioner’s alleged failure to timely apply for asylum constituted a changed circumstance justifying re-detention without notice and a pre-detention hearing.
- Whether the remaining preliminary-injunction factors favored temporary restraining relief.
- Whether the court should enjoin respondents from transferring petitioner out of the district or removing her from the country.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (20)
- Y.G.H. v. Trump, 787 F. Supp. 3d 1097, 1105 (E.D. Cal. 2025)(followed)
- Maxwell v. Nielsen, No. 2:14-cv-02772-TLN-AC (PS), 2018 WL 6304886, at *7 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 3, 2018), report and recommendation adopted in part sub nom. Maxwell v. Holder, 2018 WL 6831133 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 28, 2018)(followed)
- Stuhlbarg International Sales Co. v. John D. Brush & Co., 240 F.3d 832, 839 n.7 (9th Cir. 2001)(followed)
- Stormans, Inc. v. Selecky, 586 F.3d 1109, 1127 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20, 22 (2008)(followed)
- Center for Food Safety v. Vilsack, 636 F.3d 1166, 1172 (9th Cir. 2011)(followed)
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, 559 F.3d 1046, 1052 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell, 632 F.3d 1127, 1131, 1134-35, 1139 (9th Cir. 2011)(followed)
- Klein v. City of San Clemente, 584 F.3d 1196, 1201 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Caribbean Marine Services Co. v. Baldrige, 844 F.2d 668, 674 (9th Cir. 1988)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 20.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.