Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California partially granted petitioner Joao Alexandre Dos Reis Franco’s ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order challenging his detention by ICE after his arrest at an adjustment-of-status interview. The court ordered his immediate release and prohibited respondents from using the adjustment-of-status process to re-detain him, while denying requests concerning his removal or interference with adjudication of his Form I-485 application.
Holdings
- For purposes of temporary injunctive relief, petitioner demonstrated a likelihood of success on his claim that arresting and detaining him at his adjustment-of-status interview violated the INA.
- Petitioner satisfied the requirements for temporary injunctive relief by showing likely success on the merits, likely irreparable harm, and that the balance of equities and public interest favored relief.
- The court could order petitioner's immediate release and enjoin respondents from using the adjustment-of-status process to re-detain him, but the requested injunction against transfer or removal was moot and the requested injunction concerning adjudication of the Form I-485 was denied.
- Petitioner was not required to post a bond under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c).
Questions Presented
- Whether petitioner satisfied the preliminary-injunction standard for temporary relief against his immigration detention.
- Whether ICE's arrest and detention of petitioner at his adjustment-of-status interview likely violated the Immigration and Nationality Act.
- Whether petitioner demonstrated likely irreparable harm, a favorable balance of equities, and a public interest supporting temporary injunctive relief.
- Whether respondents should be enjoined from transferring or removing petitioner or from denying or interfering with adjudication of his pending Form I-485 application.
- Whether petitioner was required to post a bond under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c).
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (19)
- Stuhlbarg International Sales Co. v. John D. Brush & Co., 240 F.3d 832, 839 n.7 (9th Cir. 2001)(followed)
- Stormans, Inc. v. Selecky, 586 F.3d 1109, 1127 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20, 22 (2008)(followed)
- Center for Food Safety v. Vilsack, 636 F.3d 1166, 1172 (9th Cir. 2011)(followed)
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, 559 F.3d 1046, 1052 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell, 632 F.3d 1127, 1131, 1134-35 (9th Cir. 2011)(followed)
- Klein v. City of San Clemente, 584 F.3d 1196, 1201 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Caribbean Marine Services Co. v. Baldrige, 844 F.2d 668, 674 (9th Cir. 1988)(followed)
- Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. VidAngel, Inc., 869 F.3d 848, 856 (9th Cir. 2017)(followed)
- You, Xiu Qing v. Nielsen, 321 F. Supp. 3d 451, 464-66, 469 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 19.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…