John W. Williams v. Beer, et al.

Williams v. Beer, No. 1:21-cv-00155-KES-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 30, 2025) · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · October 30, 2025 · No. 1:21-cv-00155-KES-EPG (PC)

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California denied Plaintiff John W. Williams’s motion to limit the scope of a subpoena issued to Atascadero State Hospital for medical, mental-health, and disciplinary records. The court concluded that Plaintiff had waived confidentiality concerns regarding medical records by placing his physical and psychological injuries at issue, and that the subpoena was sufficiently limited and relevant to the claims and defenses.

Holdings

  1. A party generally lacks standing to object to a subpoena served on a nonparty, but may object when the subpoena implicates the party's personal right or privilege or imposes an undue burden on the party.
  2. A party waives a general privacy or confidentiality objection to medical records when the party places physical or mental health at issue and seeks damages for those injuries.
  3. The subpoena did not impose an undue burden warranting limitation because it sought relevant records for a limited period, described the requested materials with particularity, and imposed no production burden on plaintiff.
  4. The prior order in the unrelated case did not justify limiting the subpoena, and plaintiff failed to develop an argument showing that the clean-hands doctrine applied.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether plaintiff had a valid basis to limit or quash a subpoena directed to a nonparty hospital seeking his medical, mental-health, and disciplinary records.
  2. Whether plaintiff's claims for physical and psychological injuries and damages waived confidentiality or privacy objections concerning the subpoenaed medical records.
  3. Whether the subpoena imposed an undue burden or was overbroad, duplicative, or otherwise improper under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45.
  4. Whether a prior order in an unrelated case and the clean-hands doctrine required limiting the subpoena.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (7)

  • United States v. Viltrakis, 108 F.3d 1159, 1161 (9th Cir. 1997)(followed)
  • In re Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated Dec. 10, 1987, 926 F.2d 847, 852 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)
  • Crispin v. Christian Audigier, Inc., 717 F. Supp. 2d 965, 973 (C.D. Cal. 2010)(followed)
  • Televisa, S.A. de C.V. v. Univision Commc'ns, Inc., No. CV 05-3444 PSGMANX, 2008 WL 4951213, at *1-*2 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2008)(followed)
  • Christin v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc., No. 1:24-CV-00619-KES-SAB, 2025 WL 391013, at *3 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2025)(followed)
  • Canton v. U.S. Foods, Inc., No. 22-CV-04226-TLT (LJC), 2023 WL 4053798, at *2 (N.D. Cal. June 16, 2023)(followed)
  • Williams v. Black, No. 2:20-cv-4300-PSG-MAA(distinguished)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…