Summary
The court denied a pro se prisoner’s motion for appointment of counsel in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Applying the exceptional-circumstances standard, the court found that the case was not legally or factually complex, the plaintiff could articulate his claims, and the early procedural posture did not establish a likelihood of success on the merits.
Holdings
- A district court may request voluntary assistance of counsel for an indigent prisoner in a § 1983 action only when exceptional circumstances exist, evaluated by considering both the likelihood of success on the merits and the plaintiff's ability to articulate claims in light of the legal and factual complexity.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court should appoint counsel for an indigent prisoner pursuing a § 1983 action.
- Whether Plaintiff established exceptional circumstances based on the likelihood of success on the merits, his ability to articulate his claims, and the alleged complexity of the case.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Mallard v. United States District Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989)(followed)
- Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)
- Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…