Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California adopted the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations after the plaintiff filed no objections. The court dismissed the § 1983 action without prejudice for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, and failure to state a claim, and directed the Clerk to close the case.
Holdings
- The district court presumed the magistrate judge's findings of fact to be correct and reviewed the magistrate judge's conclusions of law de novo.
- The district court adopted the findings and recommendations in full and dismissed the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, and failure to state a claim.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court should adopt the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations when the plaintiff filed no objections.
- Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, and failure to state a claim.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (2)
- Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979)(followed)
- Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…