Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California grants Lance Williams’s application to proceed in forma pauperis in a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court finds that Williams demonstrated an inability to pay the filing fee and directs that the complaint be screened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e).
Holdings
- Because Plaintiff was not in custody when he commenced the action and did not indicate that he was incarcerated, the prisoner-specific filing-fee provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b) and the three-strikes bar in § 1915(c) did not apply.
- Plaintiff demonstrated that he was unable to pay the filing fee or give security therefor, and his application to proceed in forma pauperis was properly granted.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff demonstrated under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) that he was unable to pay the filing fee or give security therefor.
- Whether the Prison Litigation Reform Act's prisoner filing-fee and three-strikes provisions applied to Plaintiff.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (7)
- Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1122 (9th Cir. 2005)(followed)
- Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory Council, 506 U.S. 194, 198 n.2 (1993)(followed)
- Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1231 (9th Cir. 1984)(followed)
- Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319 (1989)(abrogated)
- Adkins v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339 (1948)(followed)
- Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1236 (9th Cir. 2015)(followed)
- Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1236 (9th Cir. 2015)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…