Summary
The court recommends striking the plaintiff’s unsigned complaint and dismissing the action without prejudice because the plaintiff failed to submit a signed complaint after being ordered to do so. The document also orders the Clerk to randomly assign a district judge and advises the parties regarding objections to the findings and recommendations.
Holdings
- An unsigned complaint must be stricken when the plaintiff has been given an opportunity to sign it and fails to do so.
- The action should be dismissed without prejudice when plaintiff fails to submit a signed complaint and therefore leaves the action without an operative complaint.
Questions Presented
- Whether an unsigned complaint must be stricken after the plaintiff has been given an opportunity to sign it.
- Whether an action should be dismissed without prejudice when the plaintiff fails to submit an operative signed complaint.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (5)
- West v. Hulbert, No. 1:16-CV-00046-DAD, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64378, at *1 (E.D. Cal. May 16, 2016)(followed)
- Anderson v. Krpan, No. 1:14-CV-01380-AWWI, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11412, at *5 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2015)(followed)
- Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
- Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998)(followed)
- Martinez v. Yist, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…