Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California adopted the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations in a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas proceeding. The court granted the respondent’s motion to dismiss, granted a stay under Kelly v. Small, denied a Rhines v. Weber stay for lack of good cause, administratively stayed the case, and directed the petitioner to provide periodic status reports and later file an amended petition.
Holdings
- The district court adopted the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations in full because they were supported by the record and the magistrate judge's analysis.
- Respondent's motion to dismiss was granted.
- Petitioner was granted a stay of the proceedings to the extent authorized by the Kelly procedure.
- A stay under the Rhines procedure was denied because petitioner failed to show good cause.
Questions Presented
- Whether the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations should be adopted after review of the record and the absence of objections.
- Whether respondent's motion to dismiss should be granted.
- Whether petitioner's proceedings should be stayed under the Kelly procedure or the Rhines procedure.
- What procedures should govern the case while petitioner exhausts his state-court remedies.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979)(followed)
- Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School District, 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983)(followed)
- Kelly v. Small, 315 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2003)(applied)
- Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005)(applied)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…