Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California ordered plaintiff Lucio Justo Ramos Carrillo to show cause why his case should not be dismissed. The order states that plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee or submit a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis, and directs him to comply within twenty-one days. It warns that failure to respond may result in a recommendation of dismissal for failure to pay, failure to prosecute, and failure to comply with court orders.
Holdings
- A district court may impose sanctions, including dismissal, when a litigant fails to comply with court orders or applicable local rules.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court should require plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee, failure to prosecute, and failure to comply with court orders.
- Whether failure to respond to the order to show cause should result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005)(followed)
- Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988)(followed)
- Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…