Lukas Elijah Henderson and Betty Ann Henderson v. Americore Humanology, et al.

Henderson v. Americore Humanology · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · October 28, 2025 · No. 1:25-cv-01428-JLT-EPG

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California directs Plaintiffs Lukas Elijah Henderson and Betty Ann Henderson to supplement their incomplete application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court requires submission of a completed long-form application or payment of the filing fee within 30 days and warns that failure to comply may result in dismissal.

Holdings

  1. An in forma pauperis application that omits required information about assets, employment, income sources, and expenses may be required to be supplemented before the court determines whether the applicant is unable to pay the filing fee.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court could require Plaintiffs to supplement an incomplete application to proceed in forma pauperis before determining eligibility under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (4)

  • Flores v. California Corr. Women's Facility, No. 1:19-cv-1509-NONE-JLT, 2020 WL 8821643, at *1 (E.D. Cal. June 24, 2020)(followed)
  • Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1234-35 (9th Cir. 2015)(followed)
  • United States v. McQuade, 647 F.2d 938, 940 (9th Cir. 1981)(followed)
  • Jefferson v. United States, 277 F.2d 723, 725 (9th Cir. 1960)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…