Macquarrie v. Commissioner of Social Security

Macquarrie · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · April 10, 2025 · No. 1:21-cv-00072-CDB

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California granted Plaintiff’s counsel’s unopposed motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). The court awarded $19,000.46, representing 25% of Plaintiff’s past-due Social Security benefits, and found the fee reasonable based on counsel’s performance, the successful result, and 24.1 hours of work. Counsel was ordered to reimburse Plaintiff the previously awarded $5,000 EAJA fee.

Holdings

  1. The requested $19,000.46 fee was reasonable and did not constitute a windfall because counsel achieved a successful result, did not cause delay, and reasonably spent 24.1 hours litigating the case.
  2. The § 406(b) award must be offset by the $5,000 previously awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act, and counsel must reimburse that amount to Plaintiff after receiving the § 406(b) fees.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether counsel's requested fee of $19,000.46 under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), equal to 25 percent of Plaintiff's past-due benefits, was reasonable.
  2. Whether the § 406(b) award had to be offset by the previously awarded EAJA fees.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (13)

  • Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 794 (2002)(followed)
  • Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 796 (2002)(followed)
  • Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 798 n.6 (2002)(followed)
  • Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 808 (2002)(followed)
  • Crawford v. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142, 1149 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)
  • Crawford v. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142, 1153 (9th Cir. 2009) (Clifton, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part)(applied)
  • Smith v. Kijakazi, No. 1:13-cv-01717-BAK-SKO, 2022 WL 1471035, at *2 (E.D. Cal. May 10, 2022)(followed)
  • Soriano v. Saul, 831 F. App'x 844, 844-45 (9th Cir. 2020)(distinguished)
  • Coles v. Berryhill, No. EDCV 14-1488-KK, 2018 WL 3104502, at *3 (C.D. Cal. June 21, 2018)(applied)
  • Garcia v. O'Malley, No. 1:20-cv-01366-SKO, 2024 WL 1118782, at *3 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2024)(applied)

Showing top 10 of 13.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…