Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California ordered Adam J. Kress to show cause why his application for admission pro hac vice should not be denied. The court cited Local Rule 180(b)(2) and expressed concern that his recent pro hac vice applications in other California cases may indicate that he is regularly engaged in professional activities in California.
Holdings
- The court ordered Adam J. Kress to show cause within fourteen days why his pro hac vice admission should not be denied based on the possibility that he is regularly engaged in professional activities in California.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court should require Adam J. Kress to show cause why his pro hac vice application should not be denied under Eastern District of California Local Rule 180(b)(2) because he may be regularly engaged in professional activities in California.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Guguni v. Chertoff, 2008 WL 2080788, at *1 (N.D. Cal. May 14, 2008)(followed)
- Mendoza v. Golden West Sav. Ass'n Services Co., 2009 WL 2050486, at *1-2 (C.D. Cal. July 7, 2009)(followed)
- Ang v. Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc., 2015 WL 1474866, at *2-3 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2015)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…