Summary
The court addresses a defendant's notice indicating that the plaintiff in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action had died. It vacates the pending motion to dismiss and directs the defendant to file a formal notice of death and serve it on the plaintiff's representative or successor in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25 and Ninth Circuit precedent. The court indicates that a motion to dismiss may be filed after the substitution period expires.
Holdings
- The ninety-day period for seeking substitution under Rule 25(a) is not triggered until a party formally suggests the death on the record and serves the suggestion of death in the manner required by Rule 25 and the applicable service rules.
- The defendant's motion to dismiss was vacated pending the filing and service of a formal notice of plaintiff's death.
Questions Presented
- Whether defendant's notice that plaintiff had died was sufficient to trigger the ninety-day substitution period under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a).
- Whether defendant's pending motion to dismiss should remain pending before a formal suggestion of death was filed and properly served.
Disposition
vacated
Cases Cited (2)
- Robertson v. Wegmann, 436 U.S. 584, 590 (1978)(followed)
- Barlow v. Ground, 39 F.3d 231, 233 (9th Cir. 1994)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…