Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California adopted findings and recommendations recommending dismissal of Ugochukwu L. Onebunne’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The court held that, because the petitioner was subject to a final order of removal, the First Step Act barred him from applying earned time credits toward release, and it dismissed the petition with prejudice.
Holdings
- An inmate subject to a final order of removal is expressly ineligible under 18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4)(E)(i) to receive earned time credits to reduce the length of incarceration. Because petitioner was subject to such an order, he was not entitled to the requested habeas relief.
- A certificate of appealability is not required for an appeal from an order denying a § 2241 petition when the detention complained of does not arise from process issued by a state court.
Questions Presented
- Whether a federal prisoner subject to a final order of removal is eligible to receive First Step Act earned time credits to reduce the length of incarceration.
- Whether the petition should be dismissed after the district court adopted the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations.
- Whether a certificate of appealability is required for an appeal from the denial of a § 2241 petition.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (5)
- Forde v. U.S. Parole Commission, 114 F.3d 878 (9th Cir. 1997)(followed)
- Ojo v. INS, 106 F.3d 680, 681-682 (5th Cir. 1997)(persuasive)
- Bradshaw v. Story, 86 F.3d 164, 166 (10th Cir. 1996)(persuasive)
- United States v. Bernal-Obeso, 989 F.2d 331, 333 (9th Cir. 1993)(followed)
- United States v. Basher, 629 F.3d 1161, 1165 n.2 (9th Cir. 2011)(persuasive)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…