Oscar C.M. v. Todd Lyons, et al.

Oscar C.M. · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · December 22, 2025 · No. 1:25-cv-01915-TLN-SCR

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California granted Oscar C.M.’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging immigration detention without a bond hearing. The court held that 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), rather than § 1225(b)(2), governed the petitioner’s detention and required a bond hearing. It also concluded that continued detention without an individualized hearing violated due process and ordered immediate release subject to a $5,000 bond and alternatives to detention.

Holdings

  1. Section 1225(b)(2) applies to noncitizens seeking admission, and Petitioner, who was living in the interior of the United States, was not an applicant seeking admission. Petitioner’s detention was therefore governed by § 1226(a), which entitled him to the statutorily permitted process, including at least a bond hearing.
  2. Petitioner’s continued civil immigration detention without a hearing before a neutral decisionmaker violated the Due Process Clause because he had a protected liberty interest, the risk of erroneous deprivation was considerable, and the government’s interest in detention without a hearing was negligible.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2), rather than 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), authorized Petitioner’s mandatory immigration detention without a bond hearing.
  2. Whether continued immigration detention without an individualized custody hearing violated Petitioner’s procedural due process rights.

Disposition

writ_granted

Cases Cited (21)

  • Matter of Yajure Hurtado, 291 I. & N. Dec. 216, 225 (BIA 2025)(discussed)
  • Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507, 525 (2004)(followed)
  • Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 484 (1973)(followed)
  • I.N.S. v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. 289, 301 (2001)(followed)
  • Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 687, 690, 693-94 (2001)(followed)
  • Aroldo Rodriguez Diaz v. Merrick Garland, Rodriguez Diaz v. Garland, 53 F.4th 1189, 1196, 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 2022)(followed)
  • Hortua v. Chestnut, No. 1:25-cv-01670-TLN-JDP, 2025 WL 3525916 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2025)(followed)
  • Barco Mercado v. Francis, No. 25-CV-6582 (LAK), 2025 WL 3295903, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 26, 2025)(followed)
  • Mirley Adriana Bautista Pico v. Noem, No. 25-CV-08002-JST, 2025 WL 3295382, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 26, 2025)(followed)
  • Armando Modesto Estrada-Samayoa v. Cruz, No. 1:25-CV-01565-EFB (HC), 2025 WL 3268280, at *4 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2025)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 21.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…