Parker v. N. West

Parker · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · February 20, 2025 · No. No. 2:22-cv-2015 CSK P

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California granted the defendant's renewed motion to compel incarcerated nonparty witness Durrell Puckett to comply with a deposition subpoena. The court ordered Puckett to attend and participate in a deposition by April 18, 2025, and cautioned that further refusal could result in sanctions.

Holdings

  1. The court may compel an incarcerated nonparty witness to comply with a properly served deposition subpoena when the requested testimony is relevant and the witness has not formally objected or otherwise shown adequate hardship. Defendant established good cause, so the motion to compel was granted.
  2. A declaration filed by the nonparty witness did not substitute for compliance with the deposition subpoena; Puckett was ordered to attend and participate in the deposition.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court should compel an incarcerated nonparty witness who failed to formally object to a properly served subpoena to attend and participate in a deposition.
  2. Whether the relevance and importance of the nonparty witness's testimony outweighed any potential hardship associated with the deposition.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (9)

  • Hunt v. County of Orange, 672 F.3d 606, 616 (9th Cir. 2012)(followed)
  • Pennwalt Corp. v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., 708 F.2d 492, 494 n.5 (9th Cir. 1983)(followed)
  • Gonzales v. Google, Inc., 234 F.R.D. 674, 680 (N.D. Cal. 2006)(followed)
  • In re Subpoena to VaughnPerling, 2019 WL 8012372, at *3 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2019)(followed)
  • Fujikura Ltd. v. Finisar Corp., 2015 WL 5782351, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2015)(followed)
  • People v. Durrell Anthony Puckett, No. 20FE002269 (Sacramento Cnty. Sup. Ct. Cal.)(judicially noticed)
  • Daniels-Hall v. National Education Association, 629 F.3d 992, 999 (9th Cir. 2010)(followed)
  • White v. Martel, 601 F.3d 882, 885 (9th Cir. 2010)(followed)
  • McCoy v. Sw. Airlines Co., 211 F.R.D. 381, 385 (C.D. Cal. 2002)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…