Pastor Isabel Vela v. Breckenridge, et al.

Vela · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · December 16, 2025 · No. 1:25-cv-01259-KES-BAM

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California recommends dismissing Pastor Isabel Vela’s action without prejudice for failure to obey a court order and failure to prosecute. The recommendation follows Plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis after being ordered to do so. The document provides a fourteen-day period for objections.

Holdings

  1. A district court may dismiss an action when a party fails to prosecute, fails to obey a court order, or fails to comply with applicable local rules, pursuant to the court's inherent power to control its docket.
  2. Dismissal without prejudice is appropriate where the public interest in expeditious resolution, the court's need to manage its docket, and the risk of prejudice weigh in favor of dismissal; the merits factor provides little support for a party whose conduct impedes progress; and the court has considered less drastic sanctions.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff's failure to obey the court's order requiring payment of the filing fee or submission of an in forma pauperis application.
  2. Whether dismissal without prejudice is warranted for failure to prosecute after considering the applicable five-factor dismissal test and less drastic sanctions.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (11)

  • Thompson v. Housing Authority, 782 F.2d 829, 831 (9th Cir. 1986)(followed)
  • Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53-54 (9th Cir. 1995)(followed)
  • Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
  • Malone v. United States Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130-33 (9th Cir. 1987)(followed)
  • Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1423 (9th Cir. 1986)(followed)
  • Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440 (9th Cir. 1988)(followed)
  • Anderson v. Air West, 542 F.2d 522, 524 (9th Cir. 1976)(followed)
  • Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 643 (9th Cir. 2002)(followed)
  • In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Products Liability Litigation, 460 F.3d 1217, 1228 (9th Cir. 2006)(followed)
  • Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 11.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…