Summary
The document is an order and findings and recommendations in a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas action challenging the denial of 138 days of presentencing custody credits. The magistrate judge recommends summary dismissal because the petition duplicates a pending habeas action concerning the same conviction and claim. The court grants the petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and directs random assignment to a district judge.
Holdings
- The magistrate judge recommended summary dismissal because the petition duplicated the pending federal habeas action Belyew v. Parker, No. 2:19-cv-0294-DAD-AC, which challenged the same conviction and presentencing custody-credit issue.
- The court granted petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
Questions Presented
- Whether the § 2254 petition should be summarily dismissed as duplicative of a pending federal habeas action involving the same conviction and presentencing-credit claim.
- Whether the petitioner should be granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (5)
- Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 478 (2000)(followed)
- MGIC Indem. Co. v. Weisman, 803 F.2d 500, 505 (9th Cir. 1986)(followed)
- United States v. Wilson, 631 F.2d 118, 119 (9th Cir. 1980)(followed)
- Morris v. Woodford, 229 F.3d 775, 780 (9th Cir. 2000)(followed)
- Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…