Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California grants Fresno Community Hospital and Medical Center’s motion to set aside the Clerk’s entry of default in a putative wage-and-hour class and collective action. Applying Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(c), the court finds no culpable conduct, a potential meritorious defense based on arbitration, and no tangible prejudice to the plaintiff. The court vacates the scheduled hearing, sets aside the default, and deems the defendant’s lodged answer filed as of the order’s date.
Holdings
- Good cause existed to set aside the Clerk's entry of default because the Hospital was not culpable, presented facts supporting a potentially meritorious defense, and Plaintiff failed to show tangible prejudice.
- The Hospital's failure to respond was not culpable because the record did not establish an intentional, willful, deliberate, or bad-faith failure to answer.
- The Hospital satisfied the minimal meritorious-defense requirement by presenting specific facts supporting a potential defense based on an arbitration agreement that it might enforce as a third-party beneficiary under equitable estoppel.
- Setting aside the entry of default would not cause cognizable prejudice because Plaintiff showed no tangible harm beyond delay.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Hospital showed good cause under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(c) to set aside the Clerk's entry of default.
- Whether the Hospital's failure to respond was culpable or resulted from intentional, willful, deliberate, or bad-faith conduct.
- Whether the Hospital presented specific facts constituting a potentially meritorious defense.
- Whether setting aside the entry of default would cause Plaintiff tangible prejudice beyond delay.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (25)
- Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471 (9th Cir. 1986)(followed)
- Symantec Corp. v. Global Impact, Inc., 559 F.3d 922, 923 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Franchise Holding II, LLC v. Huntington Rests. Group, Inc., 375 F.3d 922, 925-26 (9th Cir. 2004)(followed)
- United States v. Signed Personal Check No. 730 of Yubran S. Mesle, 615 F.3d 1085, 1089, 1091-95 (9th Cir. 2010)(followed)
- Brandt v. American Bankers Insurance Co., 653 F.3d 1108, 1111-12 (9th Cir. 2011)(followed)
- O'Connor v. State of Nevada, 27 F.3d 357, 364 (9th Cir. 1994)(followed)
- Westchester Fire Insurance Co. v. Mendez, 585 F.3d 1183, 1189 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- TCI Group Life Insurance Plan v. Knoebber, 244 F.3d 691, 697, 701 (9th Cir. 2001)(followed)
- Egelhoff v. Egelhoff, a minor, by and through her natural parent, Breiner, et al., Egelhoff v. Egelhoff ex rel. Breiner, 532 U.S. 141 (2001)(noted)
- American Alliance Insurance Co., Ltd. v. Eagle Insurance Co., 92 F.3d 57, 61 (2d Cir. 1996)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 25.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…