Pinnacle Bank v. Alacrity Solutions Group, LLC

Pinnacle Bank · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · November 18, 2025 · No. 2:25-cv-00774-CKD

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California granted Alacrity Solutions Group, LLC’s motion to dismiss Pinnacle Bank’s first amended complaint. The court dismissed claims for breach of contract, open book account, and account stated without leave to amend, concluding that Pinnacle Bank had not adequately alleged that Alacrity was obligated to pay the invoices or that Alacrity breached the Member Agreement. The court declined to address the forum-selection clause and directed the Clerk to close the case.

Holdings

  1. The open book account and account stated claims were dismissed because Pinnacle agreed to their dismissal and offered no argument supporting them.
  2. Pinnacle failed to state a breach of contract claim because, although it sufficiently alleged the existence of the Member Agreement, it did not identify a contractual provision requiring Alacrity to pay Zebra or showing that Alacrity breached the agreement by failing to pay the attached invoices.
  3. The court declined to decide the validity of the forum-selection clause because the complaint failed to state a breach of contract claim and both parties agreed that the Rule 12(b)(6) issues should be resolved first.
  4. Further leave to amend was denied because Pinnacle had already received leave to amend and still failed to cure the defects, making further amendment futile.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Pinnacle adequately pleaded open book account and account stated claims.
  2. Whether Pinnacle adequately pleaded a breach of contract claim based on the Member Agreement and attached invoices.
  3. Whether the court should address the asserted forum-selection clause before resolving the Rule 12(b)(6) issues.
  4. Whether Pinnacle should be granted further leave to amend.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (13)

  • Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep't, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1990)(applied)
  • Hishon v. King & Spalding, 467 U.S. 69, 73 (1984)(applied)
  • Love v. United States, 915 F.2d 1242, 1245 (9th Cir. 1990)(applied)
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)(applied)
  • Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555, 570 (2007)(applied)
  • Oasis W. Realty, LLC v. Goldman, 51 Cal. 4th 811, 821 (2011)(applied)
  • U.S. ex rel. Oliver v. Parsons Co., 195 F.3d 457, 462 (9th Cir. 1999)(applied)
  • Frontier Contracting, Inc. v. Allen Eng'g Contractor, Inc., 2012 WL 1601659, at *4 (E.D. Cal. May 7, 2012)(applied)
  • Gibralter, LLC v. DMS Flowers, LLC, 2025 WL 1927525, at *6 (E.D. Cal. July 14, 2025)(applied)
  • Davis v. Miranda, 2020 WL 1904784, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2020)(applied)

Showing top 10 of 13.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…