Ramello Randle v. Moreno, et al.

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California adopted the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations in a prisoner civil rights action. The court dismissed the action without prejudice because the plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies before filing suit, and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.

Holdings

1. The action must be dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies before filing the civil-rights lawsuit.
2. The district court adopted the findings and recommendations in full following de novo review.

Questions Presented

1. Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies before filing the lawsuit.
2. Whether the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations should be adopted after de novo review where Plaintiff filed no objections.

Disposition

dismissed