Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California construed Raymond A. Treon's § 2241 habeas petition as a motion to amend an earlier-filed habeas petition challenging the same sentence. The court directed the Clerk to re-file the petition in the earlier case, deemed the respondent's motions moot, and closed the present case.
Holdings
- When a pro se petitioner files a habeas petition while an earlier petition challenging the same sentence remains pending, the later petition must be construed as a motion to amend the earlier petition under the circumstances presented here.
- After construing the Petition as a motion to amend the earlier-filed petition, the court directed the Clerk to refile it in the earlier case, deemed the respondent's motions moot, and closed the separate case.
Questions Presented
- Whether a pro se habeas petition filed while an earlier petition challenging the same sentence remains pending should be construed as a motion to amend the earlier petition.
- Whether the later-filed habeas case should be closed after the petition is refiled as a motion to amend in the earlier case.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (1)
- Woods v. Carey, 525 F.3d 886, 889-90 (9th Cir. 2008)(applied)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…