Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California orders the parties to submit statements addressing scheduling and discovery matters within thirty days. The order limits the required submissions to Plaintiff Michael Reyes-Villanueva and Defendant Tyson Pogue, and specifies additional issues Defendant Pogue must address, including exhaustion, investigative materials, recordings, and proper-party arguments.
Holdings
- The court ordered the case to proceed with scheduling as to the claim against Defendant Tyson Pogue only, while the stay remained in effect as to the Wellpath Defendants.
- Plaintiff and Defendant Pogue were required to file statements titled “SCHEDULING AND DISCOVERY STATEMENT” within thirty days after service of the order, addressing the specified claims, defenses, witnesses, documents, third-party records, experts, settlement, and other scheduling and discovery matters.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court should proceed with scheduling and discovery as to the claim against Defendant Tyson Pogue while the claims against the Wellpath Defendants remain stayed.
- What scheduling, discovery, exhaustion, investigation, and evidence information Plaintiff and Defendant Pogue must provide in their required statements.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (1)
- Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 94-95 (2006)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…