Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California orders pro se plaintiff Richard Woods to submit a complete inmate trust account statement and a declaration explaining all deposits and withdrawals during the relevant six-month period. The court warns that failure to comply within 14 days may result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed for failure to obey court orders and failure to prosecute.
Holdings
- Plaintiff's submission was insufficient because it did not provide complete six-month transaction information or explain the substantial deposits and withdrawals reflected in the statement.
- Plaintiff must, within 14 days of service of the order, submit a complete, numbered inmate trust account statement for the six-month period before October 30, 2025, and a declaration under penalty of perjury explaining each deposit, withdrawal, purchase, and sale during that period.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff's one-page inmate trust account statement was sufficient for the court to determine his eligibility to proceed in forma pauperis.
- Whether Plaintiff should be required to submit a complete six-month inmate trust account statement and a declaration explaining deposits, withdrawals, purchases, and sales.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Olivares v. Marshall, 59 F.3d 109, 112 (9th Cir. 1995)(followed)
- Lumbert v. Illinois Department of Corrections, 827 F.2d 257, 260 (7th Cir. 1987)(persuasive)
- Owens v. Schultz, No. 1:24-cv-00820-SKO, 2024 WL 3722881, at *1-2 (E.D. Cal. July 19, 2024)(persuasive)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…