Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California adopted the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations in a federal prisoner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition concerning a prison disciplinary proceeding. The court dismissed the petition with prejudice because it failed to state a claim for habeas relief, directed the Clerk to enter judgment and close the case, and determined that no certificate of appealability is required.
Holdings
- The findings and recommendations were supported by the record and proper analysis and were adopted in full; the § 2241 petition was dismissed with prejudice.
- A certificate of appealability is not required because the order denies a petition under § 2241 rather than a final habeas order involving detention arising from process issued by a state court.
Questions Presented
- Whether the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations recommending dismissal of the § 2241 petition with prejudice should be adopted after de novo review.
- Whether a certificate of appealability is required for an appeal from an order denying a § 2241 petition concerning federal custody.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (4)
- Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014)(followed)
- Forde v. U.S. Parole Commission, 114 F.3d 878 (9th Cir. 1997)(followed)
- Ojo v. INS, 106 F.3d 680, 681-682 (5th Cir. 1997)(followed)
- Bradshaw v. Story, 86 F.3d 164, 166 (10th Cir. 1996)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…