Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California denies Defendants’ request for judicial notice and grants their motion for summary judgment in Robert Hart’s civil-rights action. Hart alleged that Deputy Edgardo Sandoval arrested him without a warrant or probable cause and asserted related equal-protection and municipal-liability claims against Sandoval and the County of Tulare. The court determined that no material facts were in dispute and ruled for Defendants.
Holdings
- Deputy Sandoval had probable cause to arrest Hart for domestic violence because, under the totality of the circumstances known at the time of arrest, the reports from Lily and corroborating witnesses provided reasonably trustworthy information that Hart had committed domestic battery.
- Deputy Sandoval was alternatively entitled to qualified immunity because, even if probable cause were lacking, it was reasonably arguable that probable cause existed and clearly established law did not place the unlawfulness of his conduct beyond debate.
- Hart failed to establish an equal protection claim because he presented no argument or evidence showing that he was treated differently from a similarly situated person.
- The County of Tulare was entitled to summary judgment because Hart failed to establish an underlying constitutional violation, which is necessary for municipal liability under Monell.
Questions Presented
- Whether Deputy Sandoval arrested Hart without probable cause in violation of the Fourth Amendment.
- Whether Deputy Sandoval was entitled to qualified immunity even if probable cause was lacking.
- Whether Hart presented sufficient evidence to establish an equal protection claim under § 1983.
- Whether the County of Tulare could be liable under Monell for the alleged constitutional violations.
- Whether Defendants' request for judicial notice of state-court domestic-violence filings should be granted.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (47)
- Rodis v. City and County of San Francisco, 558 F.3d 964, 970-971 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658, 694-95 (1978)(followed)
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23 (1986)(followed)
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248, 252 (1986)(followed)
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 586-87 & n.11 (1986)(followed)
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electric Contractors Association, 809 F.2d 626, 630 (9th Cir. 1987)(followed)
- Triton Energy Corp. v. Square D. Co., 68 F.3d 1216, 1221 (9th Cir. 1995)(followed)
- Henry v. Gill Industries, Inc., 983 F.2d 943, 950 (9th Cir. 1993)(followed)
- Manley v. Rowley, 847 F.3d 705, 711 (9th Cir. 2017)(followed)
- Orr v. Bank of America, NT & SA, 285 F.3d 764, 772 (9th Cir. 2002)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 47.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…