Summary
The document contains findings and recommendations by a United States Magistrate Judge recommending dismissal of Alexander Rodarte’s action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. It also recommends that the Clerk close the case and advises the parties of the procedure and deadline for filing objections.
Holdings
- A district court may impose sanctions, including involuntary dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), when a plaintiff fails to prosecute or fails to comply with court orders, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or local rules.
- Dismissal under Rule 41(b) was warranted because plaintiff's continued failure to respond delayed the case, impaired docket management, created a risk of prejudice, prevented disposition on the merits, and left no adequate less drastic alternative after the court issued a warning and granted additional time.
Questions Presented
- Whether the action should be involuntarily dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) because plaintiff failed to prosecute the action.
- Whether plaintiff's failure to respond to the motion to dismiss and comply with the court's orders and local rules warranted dismissal after consideration of the Ninth Circuit's five-factor test.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (7)
- King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987)(followed)
- Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 44 (1991)(followed)
- Hells Canyon Preservation Council v. U.S. Forest Service, 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005)(followed)
- Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
- Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642-43 (9th Cir. 2002)(followed)
- Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998)(followed)
- Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1156-57 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…