Rodriguez v. Newsom

Rodriguez · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · March 12, 2025 · No. 2:24-cv-02552-CKD (PS)

Summary

The Eastern District of California grants Armando Rodriguez’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. The court dismisses the complaint for failure to allege a federal claim or establish federal-question or diversity jurisdiction, but grants leave to amend within thirty days.

Holdings

  1. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis satisfied the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and was granted.
  2. The complaint failed to establish federal-question or diversity jurisdiction because it did not allege a specific federal cause of action or facts supporting a claim within the court's original jurisdiction, and diversity jurisdiction was unavailable where plaintiff and defendants were citizens of California.
  3. The complaint was dismissed with leave to amend because it was not absolutely clear that the jurisdictional defect could not be cured by amendment.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis satisfied the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1915.
  2. Whether the complaint established federal-question or diversity subject matter jurisdiction.
  3. Whether the complaint should be dismissed with leave to amend rather than without leave to amend.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (9)

  • Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 342 & n.7 (9th Cir. 2010)(followed)
  • Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1130-31 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc)(followed)
  • Cahill v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 80 F.3d 336, 339 (9th Cir. 1996)(followed)
  • Harrison v. Kernan, 971 F.3d 1069, 1073 (9th Cir. 2020)(followed)
  • Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment, 523 U.S. 83, 89 (1998)(followed)
  • Grancare, LLC v. Thrower ex rel. Mills, 889 F.3d 543, 549-50 (9th Cir. 2018)(followed)
  • Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325, 327 (1989)(followed)
  • McDaniel v. Hinch, No. 2:17-cv-02448-KJM-CKD (E.D. Cal. July 11, 2018)(followed)
  • Lucas v. Department of Corrections, 66 F.3d 245, 248 (9th Cir. 1995)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…