Rodriguez v. Newsom

Rodriguez · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · July 25, 2025 · No. 2:24-cv-02552-DJC-CKD (PS)

Summary

The court recommends dismissing Armando Rodriguez’s action without prejudice because he failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond within the ordered thirty-day period. The findings and recommendations were submitted to the assigned district judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), with fourteen days provided for objections.

Holdings

  1. The magistrate judge recommended dismissing the action without prejudice because plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the court's order within the prescribed period.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice because plaintiff failed to comply with the order requiring an amended complaint.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (1)

  • Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…