Rood v. Secretary of CDCR

Rood · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · April 10, 2025 · No. 1:22-cv-00449-SAB (PC)

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California denied Plaintiff Colton James Rood’s motion to stay proceedings in his § 1983 action against correctional officials. The court granted him an additional thirty days to respond to the defendant’s pending motions for summary judgment, to compel discovery responses, and to stay merits-based discovery, and directed the Clerk to resend those filings and a prior order.

Holdings

  1. Plaintiff failed to meet his burden of establishing the need for a stay, so the motion to stay the proceedings was denied.
  2. Although the court denied a stay, it granted Plaintiff thirty days from service of the order to respond to Defendant's pending motions and directed the Clerk to resend the relevant filings.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Plaintiff established sufficient grounds for a stay of the entire proceedings.
  2. Whether Plaintiff should receive additional time to respond to Defendant's pending motions despite denial of a stay.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (2)

  • Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 706, 708 (1997)(followed)
  • Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…