Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California grants Jessie Rosner’s fourth motion for an extension of time to file an amended complaint in a pro se civil rights action. The court grants one final 30-day extension, directs that a copy of the screening order be provided as a one-time exception, and warns that failure to comply will result in submission of the prior dismissal recommendation without further notice.
Holdings
- Plaintiff did not establish excusable neglect because his one-sentence motion provided no adequate explanation for the delay and he had repeatedly failed to timely seek extensions or file an amended complaint.
- The court granted one final thirty-day extension as an equitable exception because no defendant had appeared and therefore no prejudice was shown, while warning that no further extension would be granted.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff showed excusable neglect sufficient to warrant an extension of the expired deadline to file an amended complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b).
- Whether the court should grant one final extension despite Plaintiff's repeated failure to comply with court orders.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Pioneer Inv. Serv. Co. v. Brunswick Assocs. Ltd. P'ship, 507 U.S. 380, 395 (1993)(followed)
- Briones v. Riviera Hotel & Casino, 116 F.3d 379, 381 (9th Cir. 1997)(followed)
- Pincay v. Andrews, 389 F.3d 853, 860 (9th Cir. 2004)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…