Scott v. County of Kern

Scott v. County of Kern · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · June 4, 2025 · No. 1:24-cv-00423-CDB

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California grants the parties’ stipulated request to consolidate three related actions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a). The court designates Scott v. County of Kern, Case No. 1:24-cv-00423-CDB, as the lead case and orders that future filings be made in that action. The order also notes the parties’ consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction and states that a separate order will address case-management dates.

Holdings

  1. The actions should be consolidated for all purposes because they involve significant and substantial common questions of fact and law, and consolidation will reduce burdens, avoid inconsistent adjudications, and eliminate duplicative evidence and procedures.
  2. The parties' consent under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) permitted reassignment of the related actions to the undersigned magistrate judge for further proceedings, including trial and entry of final judgment.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the three related actions should be consolidated for all purposes under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a).
  2. Whether the parties' consent permitted a United States Magistrate Judge to conduct all further proceedings, including trial and entry of final judgment, under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1).

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (6)

  • Garity v. APWU Nat'l Labor Org., 828 F.3d 848, 855-56 (9th Cir. 2016)(followed)
  • Inv’rs Research Co. v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for the Cent. Dist. of Cal., 877 F.2d 777, 777 (9th Cir. 1989)(followed)
  • Blount v. Boston Scientific Corp., No. 1:19-cv-00578-AWI-SAB, 2019 WL 3943872, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2019)(followed)
  • In re Oreck Corp. Halo Vacuum & Air Purifiers Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig., 282 F.R.D. 486, 491 (C.D. Cal. 2012)(followed)
  • Huene v. United States, 743 F.2d 703, 704 (9th Cir. 1984)(followed)
  • Single Chip Sys. Corp. v. Intermec IP Corp., 495 F. Supp. 2d 1052, 1057 (S.D. Cal. 2007)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…