Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California orders Plaintiff Richard Sepulveda to show cause why the court should not decline supplemental jurisdiction over his California Unruh Act claim. The order indicates that the court may adopt the magistrate judge’s recommendations concerning the Americans with Disabilities Act claim, attorneys’ fees, and injunctive relief while declining jurisdiction over the state-law claim.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's California Unruh Act claim in light of California's procedural requirements and the exceptional circumstances identified by the Ninth Circuit.
- Whether the court should adopt in part the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations concerning Plaintiff's ADA claim, attorney fees, and injunctive relief while declining supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Vo v. Choi, 49 F.4th 1167, 1171 (9th Cir. 2022)(relied upon)
- Sepulveda v. Perez, No. 23-cv-03897-EMC, 2024 WL 3748006, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2024)(relied upon)
- Sepulveda v. Valtoha Inc., No. 2:24-cv-01497-DC-CSK, 2025 WL 1742739, at *3 (E.D. Cal. June 24, 2025), report and recommendation adopted, 2025 WL 2299827 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2025)(relied upon)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…