Shakazulu Sigidi Kasenzangakhona v. L. Cano, et al.

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California adopted a magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations recommending dismissal of the plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims. The court dismissed the first amended complaint without leave to amend for failure to state a claim and directed the clerk to close the case.

Holdings

1. The Findings and Recommendations were supported by the record and proper analysis and were adopted in full after de novo review.
2. The first amended complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted and was dismissed without leave to amend.

Questions Presented

1. Whether the district court should adopt the magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendations after conducting de novo review.
2. Whether the first amended complaint should be dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

Disposition

dismissed