Summary
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California adopted the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations and dismissed Sheila-Jo Hunter Tellez’s pro se, in forma pauperis action against Donald J. Proiettii without leave to amend. The court held that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine deprived it of jurisdiction to review state-court orders concerning an estate’s claimed ownership of property and rejected plaintiff’s objections.
Holdings
- The federal district court lacked jurisdiction under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine to review plaintiff's challenges to state-court judicial orders concerning the estate's ownership claim to property.
- The action was dismissed without leave to amend because the findings and recommendations were supported by the record and proper analysis, and plaintiff's objections were unpersuasive.
Questions Presented
- Whether the federal district court had subject matter jurisdiction to review state-court orders concerning an estate's ownership claim to property.
- Whether plaintiff's objections to the magistrate judge's recommendation warranted rejection of the recommendation or amendment of the complaint.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (3)
- Lockhart v. Fretta, 766 F.3d 505 (8th Cir. 2014)(questioned)
- Centifanti v. Nix, 865 F.2d 1422, 1424 (3d Cir. 1989)(distinguished)
- Exxon Mobile Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp., 544 U.S. 280 (2005)(cited)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…